I created a new fund but when i request an all time display it shows up as having a 79% draw down. The fund is only a couple of days old and hasn't had such a draw down.( hasn't had a 22% rise on the monthly either) it is also showing a history from Oct 18.which i feel is incorrect as i think it should only display the history/results from fund inception date Other peoples funds created recently also are showing the same. Which makes me think that everybody's profit % and charts in the funds section are not a reliable indication of how the different funds are currently doing or have done since they were started..

Hi, 

I want to go to program and manager details when I click. Look at the image for details.

1. The purchase and sale condition for the GM Genesis Market project must be made only with GVT coin. BTC-ETH. This is the GM that will make it special. People are opening the site and buying and selling with GVT None. Interesting and absurd. This creates distrust in the project. Do not misunderstand what I write, do not misunderstand me, do not misunderstand me.

2. The Genesis Vision BETA series is said to be alive in October 2018, but this time it will be BETA TEST, it will be a tournament, do not test, do not lose time, do not get tired in BETA series. Do not test like ALFA in BETA phase, end these tests beforehand. Our tools broker manager says there are 300 brokers, but 300 brokers do not have their voices where they are, these brokers must work as soon as possible and be included in the system.

With a max of only 1,000,000, you would need thousands of top level managers for this platform to take off. max for a top level should be more on the terms of 100,000,000. 

People may come in with millions to invest and they are forced to split it between managers. 

Why not during this demo period, allow the managers to accept a greater amount of investors? It would allow us as investors to see some positives on our side for now. I understand during full launch that who can take what will be limited, but it would be nice just now for a short period, for us to see our investments mostly get accepted rather than rejected waiting on a possible slot day after day. It'll give us a s investors something more to look forward to and watch, whilst allowing future potential managers to build up their trading stats and popularity. Allowing to just get invested will help a lot with investor confidence initially to see and feel from our end the results, before limiting managers to their set amounts

All emails are going into my spam folder by default and are not trusted.

Although 1% of portfolio is not much it doesn't seem morally responsible to force managers and in the end investors to be exposed to GVT price fluctuations. Managers and investors should have freedom to choose where to put 100% of their investement and to what instruments to be exposed to. This would resolve any conflict of interest situation. Regulated funds work like that for obvious reasons.

The 1% fee can be added in many other ways but it shouldn't be a part of the portfolio. Maybe another 1% fee and some of it could be burned.

logo bites dick for an unbelieveably awesome project. Join us in 2018, not 1995

Icon with a moustache showing number of investors in Web Version is kind of sexist and might put off female investors.

Unless of course they have moustaches :))